Your Cart

Your cart is empty.

Anglican Orders and Ministry: What the Articles Say About Priests and Bishops

Rev. C•D•F• Warrington, M.Div.
By Rev. C•D•F• Warrington, M.Div.

Ordained Minister, M.Div.

July 6, 2026

2 min read

Anglican church interior with stained glass depicting bishops and reformers

The question of Anglican orders — whether Anglican bishops, priests, and deacons constitute a valid continuation of apostolic ministry — has been one of the most contested in ecumenical theology. Pope Leo XIII declared Anglican orders “absolutely null and utterly void” in 1896. The Thirty-Nine Articles themselves take a functional rather than metaphysical view of ordained ministry, which helps explain both Anglican confidence and ecumenical controversy.

What the Articles Say About Ministry

The Articles do not offer an elaborate theology of orders. Article XXIII states that it is not lawful for any man to take upon him the office of public preaching or ministering the Sacraments before he be lawfully called and sent to execute the same. The emphasis falls on lawful authorization by the church rather than on an unbroken chain of episcopal hands. Ministry is valid because it is ordered, not because it flows from a sacramental pipeline.

The Historic Threefold Order

Despite minimal doctrinal elaboration in the Articles themselves, the Church of England maintained the threefold order of bishops, priests, and deacons through the Reformation. Article XXXVI affirms the consecration of bishops and ordering of priests under Edward VI as done “in a most godly and devout manner.” Anglicanism preserved the historic structure while allowing divergent theological interpretations of what that structure means sacramentally.

The Priestly Function in Anglican Thought

Anglican usage of the word “priest” is revealing. The English term derives from the Greek presbyteros (elder) rather than hiereus (sacrificing priest). Anglican theology generally understands the ordained minister as one who presides over Word and Sacrament, not as one who offers sacrifice. Article XXXI explicitly rejects the idea of the Eucharist as a propitiatory sacrifice, though the Articles do not reject the language of priesthood for the ordained ministry itself.

Anglican Orders in Ecumenical Context

The question of Anglican orders remains significant in ecumenical discussions. Roman Catholic and some Eastern Orthodox bodies do not recognize Anglican ordinations as valid, while the Porvoo Communion links Anglican and Lutheran churches in a shared episcopate. The broader Anglican Communion is itself divided on who may be ordained. The Thirty-Nine Articles provide a framework of ordered ministry without resolving every question about what that order ultimately means.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the Thirty-Nine Articles say about the ordained ministry of priests and bishops?

The Thirty-Nine Articles, finalized in 1571, affirm a threefold order of ministry—bishops, priests, and deacons—as the established structure of the Church of England. Article XXIII insists that no one should preach or administer sacraments without lawful ordination. The Articles reserve episcopal ordination as the gateway to valid ministry, distinguishing Anglican orders from both Roman and purely congregationalist polities.

Are Anglican orders considered valid by the Roman Catholic Church?

In 1896 Pope Leo XIII declared Anglican orders 'absolutely null and utterly void' in the apostolic letter Apostolicae Curae, arguing that the Edwardian ordinal of 1552 lacked proper form and intention. Anglicans have consistently rejected this judgment, pointing to the historical continuity of episcopal succession. The question remains a significant ecumenical obstacle between Rome and Canterbury.

What is the difference between a priest and a bishop according to Anglican theology?

Anglican theology, following the Articles and the ordinal in the Book of Common Prayer, holds that bishops possess the fullness of holy orders and alone possess the authority to ordain other clergy. Priests are ordained to preach the Word, celebrate the Eucharist, and pronounce absolution, but they cannot ordain. This graduated distinction has been maintained in Anglicanism since the Reformation settlement of the 1550s and 1560s.

How did Thomas Cranmer shape the Anglican understanding of ordination?

Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury from 1533 to 1556, drafted the 1549 and 1552 ordinals that defined the rites for ordaining deacons, priests, and bishops in the Church of England. His revisions moved Anglican ordination away from the Catholic emphasis on sacrificial priesthood toward an evangelical model focused on preaching and pastoral oversight. Cranmer's theological framework, rooted in Reformation principles, has shaped Anglican ministry ever since.

Why does the historic episcopate matter for Anglican identity and ecumenism?

The historic episcopate—the unbroken succession of bishops from the apostolic era—serves as a sign of continuity, catholicity, and unity in Anglican ecclesiology. The Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral of 1888 listed the historic episcopate as one of four essentials for any future reunion with other churches. For Anglicans, episcopal order is not merely administrative but is tied to the church's apostolic mission and sacramental life.

Free Creed Study Resources

Sign up for our occasional email: Christian Creed Study Resources. Get exclusive study guides, book lists, and updates from our academic network.